  |
|
Re: Networks Ignore Front Page IRS Story
Posted by **BlackMonk** on Sep 23, 2013 at 7:48:40 PM:
In Reply to: Re: Networks Ignore Front Page IRS Story posted by **murray** on Sep 23, 2013 at 5:02:09 PM:
*****
*****The only ones who would label these as 'phony' are those who live by the 'By Any Means Necessary' mindset ....
*****
*****
****
****Or people who disagree with you.
****
****Are you really going to claim that only you and people who agree with you are in full posession of the facts and that your interpretation of those facts is the only possible one that can be legitimately reached?
****
****\
***
***
***
*** I'm saying that anyone who believes that these things are nothing more than 'phony scandals' are slimeballs...
***
***
***
***
***
***
*** We can disagree on elements involved but if one can sum it all up as 'phony scandals', heaven only knows what else he or she could condone..
**
**So, it's ok if someone disagrees with you, as long as they come to the same basic conclusion that you did, but if they think you're completely wrong, they're a "slimeball?"
**
**Sorry, but there's plenty of reason to think that your basic premises are wrong.
**
**What you're claiming is like saying "you can disagree with Obama about details, but if you think he's a bad president, you're speaking out of racism."
**
**
**
**
*
*
*
* I am talking about people who say all of it amounts to 'phony Scandals'...
*
*
*
* The people who died in Benghazi were real..
*
However, you insist that people have to share you opinions about who is responsible.
*
* The parents still begging for answers are real..
*
*
*
* IRS targeting is real...It was admitted...
*
Untrue.
*
*
*
*
* We can disagree about how much blame Obama or Hillary or other key players deserve...
*
Really? When you claim it's a "scandal," you're implying that you know who is responsible. Otherwise, it's an event. It's only a scandal if there's a person to be scandalized.
*
*
* But yes, if one believes this is all phony, I am definitely of the opinion that such a person is a slimeball...
*
*
*
*
*
*
*Not to mention having with a extremely fragile hold on reality...
*
*
*
* Am I not entitled to an opinion which doesn't meet your approval?
*
You're entitled to have any opinion you want, but if I think you're wrong, I'm entitled to have that opinion. Am I not just as entitled to pass judgement over people based on their opinions as you are?
*
* You are perfectly free to characterize my feelings on such matters any which way you like...
*
When did I say you weren't allowed to post your opinions?
*
*And I will still think the people in question are slimeballs...
Followup Messages:
- Re: Networks Ignore Front Page IRS Story - **murray** - Sep 23, 2013 at 8:33:34 PM
- Re: Networks Ignore Front Page IRS Story - **BlackMonk** - Sep 23, 2013 at 10:45:41 PM
- Re: Networks Ignore Front Page IRS Story - **murray** - Sep 23, 2013 at 10:56:53 PM
- Re: Networks Ignore Front Page IRS Story - **murray** - Sep 23, 2013 at 11:30:53 PM
Home | Web Chat | Web Boards | Discography | Library | Quiz | Art & Poetry | Links | Store
Produced by Sam Choukri
Frequently Asked Questions
Last updated on Sep 23, 2013