  |
|
Re: Shooter was on Trazodone
Posted by **Johnny D** on Sep 20, 2013 at 11:55:23 PM:
In Reply to: Re: Shooter was on Trazodone posted by **bon bon** on Sep 20, 2013 at 9:06:38 PM:
***what falls apart quickly is the value of big pharma
***
***
***hj
**
**Not to those billions who found no other help and they DO and WILL help in great ways.
**
**BUT, of course, I also know there WILL be side affects for "some" who will die or get very sick from the toxic affects that will be in ANY drug. It becomes a risk to benefit thing that we all have to weigh out before taking anything, even an aspirin! Some can handle that fine and others get a stomach ulcer and bleed to death. NOTHING is full proof, of course. It;s the numbers and the risks one is willing to take to get better that is the point. Much more people are helped and get better and live ling good lives through meds. A few will not be so lucky with their choice. WE just don't know how our bodies and minds will react to even peanut better before having that first taste. So it goes with meds. I tried for 30 freaking years to get my condition under control, trying everything as I fully explained in one of my ramblings as you called it. ONLY after 30 years of suffering no matter what I tried did I find the magic pill that allowed a certain function in my brain to perform normally, with NO side affects. NO urge to get a gun, never mind to use any on anybody! I am the same me before the stupid recreation drugs I took way back when, that rearranged my brain chem functions! THEY are what should be cautioned against! I felt it too, but thought it was cool and fun to get wasted. Stupid.
**
**ONLY did an SSRI correct that damage of sorts and allowed me to be ME fully! Ahhhh,,,I fell nothing but the normal way I was before the 70's! :) Thank Lexapro! And Namenda, (which allows repair of receptors). NICE!
**
**There are much more people with my experience than there are those with horrible stories of their brain not being receptive to whatever drug is in them. RISKS VS. BENEFITS! Got to know the actual numbers for the risks, to then decide to try something or not.
**
**Every side affect listed most likely won;t happen, The ones that do more than not are the very mild ones. It then works up in smaller percentages as the list of the side affect get more serious. For example, one in a thousand had thoughts of suicide. And, no one knows what other factors are involved with that person, as to what they also take without telling the clinician.
**So, that label of can cause suicidal thoughts MUST be in the label and ads.
**
**Thanks for reading this far! I appreciate your time.
*
*Compassion is missing in some who would have millions suffer.
Most of us have known that for a long time, huh? Goes with what a brain specialist said to me last year. That 50% of the people are not born with a certain function in their brain that is responsible for feeling remorse. I guess that also mean compassion. If that is the case. She can't feel the suffering of others in an imaginary way. That is not her fault. Knowledge though of millions not getting drugs that they need should have anyone "realizing" that is not a good thing. But they will ony point of the few who had bad side affects. Damn the millions. Doesn't make sense, is all it is.Followup Messages:
- no followups have been posted yet...
Home | Web Chat | Web Boards | Discography | Library | Quiz | Art & Poetry | Links | Store
Produced by Sam Choukri
Frequently Asked Questions
Last updated on Sep 20, 2013