  |
|
Re: Good for Starbucks
Posted by **Rumor** on Aug 29, 2013 at 3:12:59 PM:
In Reply to: Re: Good for Starbucks posted by **Winston OBoogie** on Aug 28, 2013 at 12:31:32 PM:
*Although I applaud Starbuck's determination to keep their employee benefits intact, I find it a bit shallow because they are hardly a small business that will be directly affected by the implementation of Obamacare and it's Employer mandate.
Starbucks’ business lends itself to many part time employees. It would be easy for them to loophole themselves out of the law. They have decided to continue doing the right thing. After-all, Starbucks provides health insurance to all their employees who work 20 or more hours per week.
*Small businesses will disappear and Obama putting the Employer mandate off for another year only delays the pain that comes ahead.
Small businesses have virtually already disappeared in America because of our very anti-capitalist monopoly laws that allow large corporations to gobble up small companies thus wiping out competition. Hello, WalMart!!!!
Most corporations will simply fit the new law into their business model as they understand it is the moral thing to do.
I can tell you one thing: It is time for the companies that intend to expand their benefits or companies that do not intend to go through hoops to penalize their employees by denying them the ability to get affordable healthcare through the company, to speak up. It is time for Americans to know which corporations are with the working middle class and which corporations are against the working middle class.Followup Messages:
- Re: Good for Starbucks - **bon bon** - Aug 31, 2013 at 12:36:50 AM
Home | Web Chat | Web Boards | Discography | Library | Quiz | Art & Poetry | Links | Store
Produced by Sam Choukri
Frequently Asked Questions
Last updated on Aug 31, 2013