Bagism: Web Board
[Show Followups] [Post New Message]
 [Search Web Boards] [Web Boards Menu] [Letter Box Web Board]

Re: George Zimmerman Rescues Family

Posted by **BlackMonk** on Jul 25, 2013 at 11:10:11 AM:
In Reply to: Re: George Zimmerman Rescues Family posted by **Johnny D** on Jul 25, 2013 at 12:13:57 AM:

*******“What if George hadn’t gotten out of his truck?”
*******
*******That’s the question Shawn Vincent, a spokesman for George Zimmerman, posed to The Daily Caller after news broke Monday that Zimmerman helped rescue a family of four from an overturned car.
*******link
*******
*********
*******
*******hj
******
******What if the rescued family were black??
******
******Spiggy
******
******
*****It shouldn't matter, as you of course already know. It would be a shame that some people would have it matter. As if many assume he hates blacks. His case was about hating crime in his area. Just so happened those crimes were committed by just a certain recognizable type of people, in general. Shame that many then just jump to the conclusion he was after ANY black kids. Instead of just one that happened to be looking as if he was casing out homes.
*****
*****Johnny
****
***************************
****
****
****at least someone is coming out - Zimmerman Prosecutors To Face Whistleblower Lawsuit From Fired Florida State Attorney Employee
****
****Kruidbos testified last month in a pre-trial hearing that he found photos on Martin's phone that included pictures of a pile of jewelry on a bed, underage nude females, marijuana plants and a hand holding a semi-automatic pistol.
****
****
****
******
****
****because all innocent teens have pics of piles of jewelry on a bed while temporarily residing in a small gated community that has had a recent rash of burglaries due to suspensions from school for fighting and drug use
****
****would have proven Zimmerman's innocence
****
****
****
****so it begs the question - have the burglaries stopped since that fateful day?
****
****if so, we may know why
****
****
****hj
***
***Wow! If true, I bet some will say it was all planted by whitey.
***
***And Obama got involved,,,WHY? Obviously without knowing the evidence. Just because Trayvon was black. Looks like the president is also racists, as the many who STILL refuse to consider the prosecution's lame case, as well as the forensics, and as well as 3 out of the people who even tried to give Zimmerman "something", but by the law, couldn't, after 13 hours of going over everything.
***
***Man,,,that info, if true is going to be overlooked, just like the case evidence and history of all the break-ins by WHOM?, before their fight and the shooting.
**
**Let's see. He had pictures of jewelry, which MUST have been related to the robberies, since there's only a small amount of jewelry in the world, and it's as though there are any popular artists who glamorize owning jewelry. He had pictures of marijuana plants? It's REALLY ironic that having pictures of marijuana plants would be considered suspect on a webboard dedicated to a musical artist from the sixties. I suppose this means every hippie in the last 45 years is a likely criminal. Ohh, and a teenage boy has pictures of nude females. That never happens. A hand holding a gun? Nope, popular culture hasn't celebrated images like that for the past several decades. Not at all.
**
**You really are bending over backwards to believe that killing Martin was perfectly legitmate.
**
**
* The obvious point is,,,,he was not the choir, candy totting biy he was made out to be. Either way,,,it does NOT change the facts of the case that the jury decided on for their verdict.
*
*So, "bending over backwards"? LOL I didn't even bring all that stuff up. Just commented on that particular story. I get it that you can't look at the what the jury had to look at, for you want to have the story many people wanted it to be. (Damned the evidence, in other words). But at least don't be serious with the bending over backwards thing about me replying to that sideline of a story. Have some sense of the obvious, and not the extreme opposite, Thanks. I don;t have to bend any which way to know the evidence presented, and how the law dictated what should be the verdict. But, have it your way in your mind, Won;t change the facts of the actual case though. So, color is that dividing to you and others? Facts of the case don't matter? Just race? It does seem that the most racists people are the ones that all of a sudden cry foul when a similar color person is up against anyone else, DESPITE the facts presented, and forget the law! But where are you "all" the rest of the year? Many out killing reach other and don't give a crap about any of them? Nice....NOT!
*

And, yet, you've bent over backwards constantly. The only "evidence" you care about is what you think proves what you already what to be the conclusion and you ignore anything that contradicts your preconcieved ideas.

You know what those pictures you were going on about have in common? They're NOT evidence as far as the Zimmerman case went because the trial wasn't about whether or not Martin was a nice person. That's the same reason why Zimmerman's previous criminal history wasn't evidence.

You want hearsay? Here's hearsay that Zimmerman wasn't an angel: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/16/george-zimmerman_n_1676729.html But you know what? That was irrelevant to the trial.

Followup Messages:

top of page

 

Home Web Chat Web Boards Discography Library Quiz Art & Poetry Links Store

Image Map -- text links below

Home | Web Chat | Web Boards | Discography | Library | Quiz | Art & Poetry | Links | Store

Produced by Sam Choukri
Frequently Asked Questions
Last updated on Jul 28, 2013