  |
|
Re: NOT GUILTY
Posted by **Winston OBoogie** on Jul 21, 2013 at 11:03:28 AM:
In Reply to: Re: NOT GUILTY posted by **BlackMonk** on Jul 20, 2013 at 3:04:35 PM:
***************Jurors: Zimmerman not guilty of 2nd-degree murder
***************
***************
******************
***************
***************hj
**************
**************
**************
**************So ends the railroad job they tried to pull on him..let's just see if the riots happen.
**************
*************
*************No riots, but here is an article about the protests that have begun:
*************
*************Look at all the white people!
************
************
************Yeah I see quite a few white people in there.... so??
************This case had noting to do with white people..Zimmerman is not white.. he's Latino. If the blacks were to riot against the whites it would be rather pointless don't you think?
************
************
************
************
***********Maybe I should have said "look at all the not-black people" - the point being that it's not a sea of black people who are taking to the streets and protesting. Plenty of "lighter" races are clearly unhappy with the verdict.
***********
***********
**********
**********I didn't indicate anything saying it would be only a black crowd
**********protesting or rioting in the first place. You really do try to read things into what people say don't you..
**********Anyway the jury has spoken. Now the Government wants to get
**********everyone riled up again as if they are actually trying to invoke a riot or violent reaction.
**********
**********like this example
**********
*********
*********So it's the government's fault when someone attacks someone else for saying something sympathetic to Martin?
*********
********
********You have to look back at what was going on before the trial was even over. There was a blatant attempt to sway public opinion by the government.
********Obama in a speech said "If he had a son, he would look like Trayvon".
********
********Here
********
********So that alone seems to be a statement to sway public opinion. Had the victim been white or Latino do you honestly think Obama would have said the same thing? It was his chance to keep connected to the black voters and those that felt
********Zimmerman was guilty and at the same time, swayed public opinion
********about what the outcome should be. When it didn't happen, Obama
********reverts to asking for calm. He played both sides of the fence.
********
********And now that the trial is over, you have those in the government
********that are trying to find new charges to get on Zimmerman so they can appease those who felt he should have been convicted. Eric
********Holder made a speech indicated they were looking for more charges
********to get Zimmerman on.
********
********Here
********
********Are they just pandering to voters or are they really trying
********to reverse justice?
********
********It's clearly an attempt IMHO to railroad Zimmerman. The train
********got derailed when he was found "Not Guilty" and now they want
********to put the train back on the track again so THEY can derail it.
********
********You get my meaning here?
********
********
********
*******
*******I always get your meaning. That's not the same as thinking your meaning has any validity.
******
******
******If what I said has no validity then maybe YOU can explain why Obama keeps raising the subject of Trayvon Martin and keeping the issue on the minds of those who didn't like the verdict and Eric Holder wants everyone to dig to find something on Zimmerman in order to bring him back to trial even to the point of asking people to send emails if they have anything they can use so they can satisfy those who aren't satisfied that Zimmerman got acquitted by a court, jury and by due process of the law.
******It's clearly a witch hunt and there's no denying it.
******
******
*****
*****You're an idiot and there's no denying it. Have fun playing with the other conspiracy nuts here.
*****
****
****
****You don't read or watch the news very much do you...
****So calling me an idiot is your way of not having any kind of
****a logical or reasonable answer for me. And btw I am NOT a conspiracy nut either. You're obviously clueless as usual.
****
***
***I read much more than it seems you do; from a wider variety of
***sources and more reliable ones as well.
***
***I call you an idiot because you are one. Logic and reason are incomprehensible to you, so why should I bother?
***
***As for being a conspiracy nut, no conspiracy nut every thinks he is one, but you very much are.
***
***
***
***
**
**
**
**Like I said, because you lack a reasonable answer and it's obvious you can't maintain a mature approach and discuss it like an adult, so you resort to name calling. There is no reason for you to resort to calling someone an idiot or a conspiracy nut just because you don't agree with them. If you did a little fact checking you might see things a bit more clearly in this particular case. There IS a concerted effort in the DOJ (spearheaded by Eric Holder) to find ways to get Zimmerman back in court again on anything they can find on him to satisfy those who were angry about his acquittal. You obviously can't see it for what it is (or refuse to).
**
**And while we are "discussing" the case, Here's another fact you have apparently (conveniently) overlooked..
**
**Forensic and Ballistics experts agreed that Trayvon was on top of Zimmerman at the time he was shot and that witnesses said Trayvon was pounding Zimmerman's head at the time he was shot would indicate it was a matter of self defense. The jury fortunately retained that little detail... one which you apparently choose to overlook for the opportunity to call others idiots or nuts.
**
**As far as I am concerned, if you can't talk reasonably on this, there is no further point in you saying anything more.
**
*
*I talk reasonably to reasonable people. You are not one.
*
*Let me add liar to idiot and conspiracy theorist. You're that,too.
tsk tsk..
I'm not the one calling people an idiot, conspiracy theorist, and a liar. If you can't respond like an adult there is no further reason for me to even go further with this. I've kept a reasonable tone throughout this thread. It's YOU who can't seem to discuss the matter without calling me names.
What you just said above is just another vain attempt to provoke a like response. All you're doing is confirming what I said wrt to your demeanor. It's obvious you don't have a reasonable response to the topic at hand. CYA.
Done.
Followup Messages:
- no followups have been posted yet...
Home | Web Chat | Web Boards | Discography | Library | Quiz | Art & Poetry | Links | Store
Produced by Sam Choukri
Frequently Asked Questions
Last updated on Jul 21, 2013