Bagism: Web Board
[Show Followups] [Post New Message]
 [Search Web Boards] [Web Boards Menu] [Letter Box Web Board]

Re: NOT GUILTY

Posted by **Winston OBoogie** on Jul 19, 2013 at 11:10:32 PM:
In Reply to: Re: NOT GUILTY posted by **BlackMonk** on Jul 17, 2013 at 2:38:57 PM:

*********Jurors: Zimmerman not guilty of 2nd-degree murder
*********
*********
************
*********
*********hj
********
********
********
********So ends the railroad job they tried to pull on him..let's just see if the riots happen.
********
*******
*******No riots, but here is an article about the protests that have begun:
*******
*******Look at all the white people!
******
******
******Yeah I see quite a few white people in there.... so??
******This case had noting to do with white people..Zimmerman is not white.. he's Latino. If the blacks were to riot against the whites it would be rather pointless don't you think?
******
******
******
******
*****Maybe I should have said "look at all the not-black people" - the point being that it's not a sea of black people who are taking to the streets and protesting. Plenty of "lighter" races are clearly unhappy with the verdict.
*****
*****
****
****I didn't indicate anything saying it would be only a black crowd
****protesting or rioting in the first place. You really do try to read things into what people say don't you..
****Anyway the jury has spoken. Now the Government wants to get
****everyone riled up again as if they are actually trying to invoke a riot or violent reaction.
****
****like this example
****
***
***So it's the government's fault when someone attacks someone else for saying something sympathetic to Martin?
***
**
**You have to look back at what was going on before the trial was even over. There was a blatant attempt to sway public opinion by the government.
**Obama in a speech said "If he had a son, he would look like Trayvon".
**
**Here
**
**So that alone seems to be a statement to sway public opinion. Had the victim been white or Latino do you honestly think Obama would have said the same thing? It was his chance to keep connected to the black voters and those that felt
**Zimmerman was guilty and at the same time, swayed public opinion
**about what the outcome should be. When it didn't happen, Obama
**reverts to asking for calm. He played both sides of the fence.
**
**And now that the trial is over, you have those in the government
**that are trying to find new charges to get on Zimmerman so they can appease those who felt he should have been convicted. Eric
**Holder made a speech indicated they were looking for more charges
**to get Zimmerman on.
**
**Here
**
**Are they just pandering to voters or are they really trying
**to reverse justice?
**
**It's clearly an attempt IMHO to railroad Zimmerman. The train
**got derailed when he was found "Not Guilty" and now they want
**to put the train back on the track again so THEY can derail it.
**
**You get my meaning here?
**
**
**
*
*I always get your meaning. That's not the same as thinking your meaning has any validity.


If what I said has no validity then maybe YOU can explain why Obama keeps raising the subject of Trayvon Martin and keeping the issue on the minds of those who didn't like the verdict and Eric Holder wants everyone to dig to find something on Zimmerman in order to bring him back to trial even to the point of asking people to send emails if they have anything they can use so they can satisfy those who aren't satisfied that Zimmerman got acquitted by a court, jury and by due process of the law.
It's clearly a witch hunt and there's no denying it.







Followup Messages:

top of page

 

Home Web Chat Web Boards Discography Library Quiz Art & Poetry Links Store

Image Map -- text links below

Home | Web Chat | Web Boards | Discography | Library | Quiz | Art & Poetry | Links | Store

Produced by Sam Choukri
Frequently Asked Questions
Last updated on Jul 21, 2013