Bagism: Web Board
[Show Followups] [Post New Message]
 [Search Web Boards] [Web Boards Menu] [Letter Box Web Board]

Re: NOT GUILTY

Posted by **Winston OBoogie** on Jul 17, 2013 at 11:18:58 AM:
In Reply to: Re: NOT GUILTY posted by **BlackMonk** on Jul 16, 2013 at 9:06:36 PM:

*******Jurors: Zimmerman not guilty of 2nd-degree murder
*******
*******
**********
*******
*******hj
******
******
******
******So ends the railroad job they tried to pull on him..let's just see if the riots happen.
******
*****
*****No riots, but here is an article about the protests that have begun:
*****
*****Look at all the white people!
****
****
****Yeah I see quite a few white people in there.... so??
****This case had noting to do with white people..Zimmerman is not white.. he's Latino. If the blacks were to riot against the whites it would be rather pointless don't you think?
****
****
****
****
***Maybe I should have said "look at all the not-black people" - the point being that it's not a sea of black people who are taking to the streets and protesting. Plenty of "lighter" races are clearly unhappy with the verdict.
***
***
**
**I didn't indicate anything saying it would be only a black crowd
**protesting or rioting in the first place. You really do try to read things into what people say don't you..
**Anyway the jury has spoken. Now the Government wants to get
**everyone riled up again as if they are actually trying to invoke a riot or violent reaction.
**
**like this example
**
*
*So it's the government's fault when someone attacks someone else for saying something sympathetic to Martin?
*

You have to look back at what was going on before the trial was even over. There was a blatant attempt to sway public opinion by the government.
Obama in a speech said "If he had a son, he would look like Trayvon".

Here

So that alone seems to be a statement to sway public opinion. Had the victim been white or Latino do you honestly think Obama would have said the same thing? It was his chance to keep connected to the black voters and those that felt
Zimmerman was guilty and at the same time, swayed public opinion
about what the outcome should be. When it didn't happen, Obama
reverts to asking for calm. He played both sides of the fence.

And now that the trial is over, you have those in the government
that are trying to find new charges to get on Zimmerman so they can appease those who felt he should have been convicted. Eric
Holder made a speech indicated they were looking for more charges
to get Zimmerman on.

Here

Are they just pandering to voters or are they really trying
to reverse justice?

It's clearly an attempt IMHO to railroad Zimmerman. The train
got derailed when he was found "Not Guilty" and now they want
to put the train back on the track again so THEY can derail it.

You get my meaning here?


Followup Messages:

top of page

 

Home Web Chat Web Boards Discography Library Quiz Art & Poetry Links Store

Image Map -- text links below

Home | Web Chat | Web Boards | Discography | Library | Quiz | Art & Poetry | Links | Store

Produced by Sam Choukri
Frequently Asked Questions
Last updated on Jul 21, 2013