Bagism: Web Board
[Show Followups] [Post New Message]
 [Search Web Boards] [Web Boards Menu] [Letter Box Web Board]

Re: dont let your guard down

Posted by **Johnny D** on Jul 15, 2013 at 10:33:31 PM:
In Reply to: dont let your guard down posted by **Hippie J** on Jul 15, 2013 at 5:31:42 AM:

*Hundreds of demonstrators voice their disappointment and anger over not guilty verdict in George Zimmerman trial
*
*Demonstrators in cities across the country took to the streets to protest the not guilty verdict in the Trayvon Martin murder trial
*After George Zimmerman was acquitted of murder protesters outside of the Florida courthouse chanted their disappointment with the court's verdict and justice system at large
*Hundreds of people took to social media to express their outrage over the verdict and many warned of revenge attacks against Zimmerman
*Hundreds marched in cities across the country with the vast majority of protests remaining peaceful
*
*Some violence broke out in Oakland where crowds smashed windows and started small fires
*
***
*
*hj
All in vein and stupid, really. WHY?

The ONLY people that weighed the evidence that ONLY was presented in that court, to come to the verdict, were 6 women! SIX People!!!! NOT millions of whitey or Latinos.


So,

1. The court evidence presented by both sides were judged by SIX PEOPLE, and from that:

2. Thousands are going to be confronted or have their roads blocked, or whatever? And, WHO has NOTHING to do with any system in THAT courtroom that had THOSE SIX PEOPLE come to THEIR Verdict, not anyone else's?

But THAT gets many to assume the SIX WOMEN did NOT take in the evidence and JUST went on some racial protocol? THEN,,,THEN,,,if that was the case, assume every whitey and Latino wanted the same racially aimed verdict?!!!! Is THAT what is being assumed by many pro Martin enthusiasts who are threatening?


The violent protestors should think about the actual 6 that casted their vote. As to WHY and HOW they came to a Not Guilty Verdict! To then maybe give the benefit of the doubt that they actually THOUGHT about ALL the evidence that was presented to THEM, to go by the words of law for the charge. If it's the law not liked,,,then do things to try to change it!

Silly and dangerous to apply the votes of 6 people to mean that it was ALL a racially slanted vote.

I guess some people just need to bust a move now and then, rather than really think it all through and say,,,Oh Yeah,,,it was JUST 6 women that spent time on the word of the law, with all the evidence in their room. Maybe they HAD to come to that verdict, for the courts DO have their rules to follow. CHANGE those rules if that is the problem,,,for I doubt it was the 6 people who most likely did what they HAD to do, as instructed, no matter what they may have thought.

Thanks for reading,
Johnny D


Followup Messages:

top of page

 

Home Web Chat Web Boards Discography Library Quiz Art & Poetry Links Store

Image Map -- text links below

Home | Web Chat | Web Boards | Discography | Library | Quiz | Art & Poetry | Links | Store

Produced by Sam Choukri
Frequently Asked Questions
Last updated on Jul 16, 2013