Bagism: Web Board
[Show Followups] [Post New Message]
 [Search Web Boards] [Web Boards Menu] [Letter Box Web Board]

Re: Violence over George Zimmerman

Posted by **The Duke** on Jul 14, 2013 at 6:54:30 PM:
In Reply to: Re: Violence over George Zimmerman posted by **BlackMonk** on Jul 14, 2013 at 6:08:05 PM:

****predict this
****
******
****
****hj
***
***Good. Did you object to the civil case against OJ Simpson?
**
**
**
**
**
** A convincing argument would need to be made that Zimmerman's actions would have been drastically altered had the person acting suspiciously not been black...
**
**
** For the verdict to be an ethical one, that is... It could be a statement verdict as we've seen in the past however...
**
**
**And if Eric Holder's involved, the ethics factor is torperdoed from the get-go...
*
*I'm trying to talk to you like an adult. Please make some effort to do so yourself.
*
*Now, you're simply wrong that "A convincing argument would need to be made that Zimmerman's actions would have been drastically altered had the person acting suspiciously not been black." That's not the standard. The question is whether Martin's civil rights were violated, not whether or not Zimmerman is a racist. OJ lost his case, but that wasn't based on whether or not his victims would have been treated differently if they were white.
*
*One thing that might hurt Zimmerman is that he would have to prove that Martin was "acting suspiciously" to a degree that his actions were reasonable. He can't simply make the assertion.
*

That he called 911 would go a distance toward proving Martin's behaviour was Sib
Suspicious.

Followup Messages:

top of page

 

Home Web Chat Web Boards Discography Library Quiz Art & Poetry Links Store

Image Map -- text links below

Home | Web Chat | Web Boards | Discography | Library | Quiz | Art & Poetry | Links | Store

Produced by Sam Choukri
Frequently Asked Questions
Last updated on Jul 15, 2013