  |
|
Re: Is there a God?
Posted by **Winston OBoogie** on Jun 27, 2013 at 11:59:44 AM:
In Reply to: Re: Is there a God? posted by **comic relief** on Jun 26, 2013 at 6:43:53 PM:
**************Pics: container ship carrying weapons for Syrian rebels splits in half
**************
**************Updates in comments section.
**************
**************Spiggy
*************
*************Why would weapons intended for Syrian rebels be shipped from Singapore to a port in Saudi Arabia that's at least 2000 km from Syria?
************
************
************
************
************
************It gives a case for plausible denial by those that actually sent them?
************
************
************
************
************
************
************
***********
***********
***********
***********Despite the fact that the US announced to the entire world it was sending arms to Syria?
***********
***********What is the actual evidence that arms were aboard that ship?
***********
***********
***********
**********
**********It's a no brainer that those weapons aren't coming directly from here. So they would have to come out of somewhere else.
**********Question is where are the shipments going to come from? If this shipment left Singapore, that would point to China's involvement
**********perhaps. Is there actual evidence those arms were aboard the ship? Why would a ship split like that...something that's NEVER
**********happened before.
*********
*********
*********
*********Similar things have happened before;
*********
*********http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-09/half-of-cargo-ship-sinking-off-n-z-coast.html
*********
*********http://www.san-nytt.se/english/container-ship-split-in-two/
*********
*********
*********In one case it was caused by a reef, another by high seas.
*********
*********I'm not saying this ship was not torpedoed/sabotaged and carrying arms but at the moment there is no proof other than bloggers saying it was.
*********
*********
*********
**********The question would arise as to who would sabotage the effort..Russia perhaps, Assad's men? There's more to the eye here is what I'm saying.
**********The deniablity factor isn't necessarily coming from us, rather it's coming from whoever is directly shipping the weapons for us.
**********
**********And now that the ship has been sunk the cat may be out of the bag already as to who else is involved in getting these arms to the rebels.
**********
**********Let's just see how it plays out. Film at 11 as they say.
**********
**********
**********
**********
**********
**********
**********
*********
*********
*********
*********
*********
********
********I'll tell you the same thing I said to CR above. There are things that THIS country does we think only other countries do.
********And don't be so eager to underestimate what clandestine activities there may be in this world at any given time.
********Sure, it sounds like something out of a Hollywood movie but ever
********wonder where those movies get their inspirations?
********This ship incident could very well turn out to be a deliberate act of sabotage and until we get ALL the facts, nobody knows for sure. This ship splitting apart like that has NEVER happened before so of course there will be speculation and you can't always accept the first explanation either.
********
********
********
********
********
*******
*******
*******
*******
*******You and your pals seem to have decided already that it was sabotage because the story (with, so far, no actual evidence of sabotage) comes from the "alternative media" who can instantly be trusted to tell the truth.
*******
*******And yes, I have heard of "rendition" and all the rest of it.
*******
*******
*******
*******
*******
******
******I never claimed for certain that it was sabotage...that's just my opinion in light of the fact that a ship has never split apart like that before. It's unprecedented.
******
******
******
******
*****
*****Why don't you scroll up and look at the link that says "container-ship-split-in-two" and tell us again 'It's unprecedented'.
****
****
****I'm not saying it's not sabotage, I don't know and neither does anyone else at the moment. The above article gives other possible factors (some of them a bit obvious, admittedly) why the ship in the English channel cracked;
****
****� The hull was not sufficiently strong at the level of the machine room.
****
**** � When the ship was built there were insufficient regulations for parts of the hull.
****
**** � Safety margins between the load capacity and the ship�s strength were not sufficiently large.
****
**** � The speed of the ship was not reduced sufficiently in the relatively stormy weather.
***
***
***
***On edit: I see you covered this in a different part of the thread, CR. I mean, the original link in the opening post has photos of what looks like the ship buckling rather than any type of explosion. But of course we must leap to the conclusion it was torpedoed.
***
***
***
***
**
**
**
**Whoever said it was torpedoed??? A torpedo would've done more than just split the ship.. LOL
**
**
**
*
*Mark 48 torpedo... "The torpedo is designed to detonate under the keel of a surface ship, breaking the ship's back and destroying its structural integrity."
*
*Weren't you supposedly in military intelligence? And wasn't it even supposedly in the navy?
You don't have to be a member of the military intelligence community to know what a torpedo does LMAO!!!!!
I'm not interested in the specifics of a torpedo and what it does... I know what it does.. I asked
Whoever said it was torpedoed???
Followup Messages:
- Re: Is there a God? - **comic relief** - Jun 27, 2013 at 12:35:13 PM
- Re: Is there a God? - **Winston OBoogie** - Jun 27, 2013 at 1:24:38 PM
Home | Web Chat | Web Boards | Discography | Library | Quiz | Art & Poetry | Links | Store
Produced by Sam Choukri
Frequently Asked Questions
Last updated on Jun 27, 2013