![]() ![]() |
Re: DC Police Chief on Kokesh
Posted by **Old Flat Top** on May 8, 2013 at 2:35:59 PM:
In Reply to: Re: DC Police Chief on Kokesh posted by **khfpl** on May 8, 2013 at 1:44:24 PM:
*****DC Police Chief: We Will Arrest Adam Kokesh and Open Carry Protesters
*****
*****Infowars.com
***** May 7, 2013
*****
*****District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department Chief Cathy Lanier says she will arrest Adam Kokesh and any other protesters who violate the district’s gun laws.
*****
*****
*****
*****“Passing into the District of Columbia with loaded firearms is a violation of the law and we’ll have to treat it as such,” she told NewsChannel 8.
*****
*****Kokesh plans to have 10,000 open carry activists march on the Capitol. Over 2,000 have so far pledged on Kokesh’s Facebook page to attend the July 4th event.
*****
*****Adam appeared on the Alex Jones Show on Monday to explain the march.
*****
*****
*******
*****
*****another line in the sand
*****
*****hj
****
****How is that a line in the sand?
****
****Don't you think the Police Department Chief is expected to do exactly what he announced to do? Don't you think that any law-abiding citizen is exactly expecting this reaction?
****
****After having watched this video (interview)with Mr. Kokesh nothing can really astonish me any more. What is going on in this head?
****
****
***It's a false flag you dumbass. If we can't get you to register what you got so we can come and take them then maybe we can con you into placing your name on a list of your own free will.
***And just for fun even let you bring them to us...
***
***I'm certain this is not going to sit well with Brother Nathanael.
***
***LOL
***
***
**So is Alex now a tool of the NWO by promoting this false flag event?
**
**
*This 'dumbass' has a much simpler approach here and that's why I posted what I posted.
*
How a man reacts to personal insults reveals much.
*My 1st question in such a case would be or is respectively: is this against the law or is this within the law.
*
*If this 'Passing into the District of Columbia with loaded firearms is a violation of the law and we’ll have to treat it as such,' is true (I suppose it is) , then it is 100 % clear what the Police Department Chief has to do.
*
Then we'll go with the supposition that it is the law in the District of Columbia.
*The only next question could be, whether a de-escalating strategy would be more appropriate, but here the way those people do their PR comes into play (as I do believe). Announcing that you want to overthrowthe government and announcing that you will break existing law and using F***kbook to promote this all is probably not the most clever way .
*
And I'm saying is that not only is it not clever it's on the level of an infant throwing a temper tantrum. (if not exactly as innocent)
Let me state it another way. I want to argue for my right to carry a gun to defend myself so I get one and aim it at you for no apparent reason. Were I to pull the trigger I highly doubt I'd get of on a self defense plea. That is the insanity of what this lone nut off the branches of the nut tree presents.
*Hippie's White Knight's posting is just another conspiraloon's wet dream.
*
I hope that's all it is but I read the news today(oh boy)
*And certainly another used opportunity to insult me. Laughable
*
Ok. Sorry I called you a dumbass. A lot of people can just shake that shit off as nothing personal just a way to show strong disagreement with a stated opinion. But hey Klaus, I've offered you enough olive branches to start a small business to no avail so let's not be so quick on the draw McGraw....
Followup Messages:
- no followups have been posted yet...
![]()
Home | Web Chat | Web Boards | Discography | Library | Quiz | Art & Poetry | Links | Store
Produced by Sam Choukri
Frequently Asked Questions
Last updated on May 8, 2013