  |
|
Re: Bostonians attack Alex Jones
Posted by **Hippie J** on May 1, 2013 at 5:31:17 AM:
In Reply to: Re: Bostonians attack Alex Jones posted by **Old Flat Top** on Apr 30, 2013 at 9:49:25 PM:
**********A reporter from Alex Jones’ Infowars.com website found himself being being verbally destroyed by a resident on the streets of Boston over claims that the recent bombings had been the result of a so-called “false flag” operation carried out by the U.S. government.
**********
**********In the YouTube video posted on Friday, a man can be heard tearing into Infowars.com reporter Dan Bidondi over “right wing conspiracy theories.”
**********
**********The day of the bombing, Jones had tweeted that “this thing stinks to high heaven #falseflag,” adding that “the FBI has been behind virtually every domestic terror plot in the US.”
**********
**********“Your boy said this was a false flag, the bomb that blew up people was a false flag,” the angry man in the video notes. “The FBI is behind the bombing, that’s what you’re here to cover. And that’s why I’m the asshole? Because the FBI blew up those people at the Boston Marathon? That’s right. That’s because you’re a dope. And what you say is dangerous and people like you shouldn’t be able to drive a car, much less espouse your opinions in public.”
**********
**********“But we have a First Amendment, got to protect it. But you’re an asshole. And so is Alex Jones… And that’s the nicest thing I can say about you, you son of a bitch.”
**********
**********“Anything else you got to say?” Bidondi asked.
**********
**********“Yeah, I just said it, motherfucker,” the man shot back. “I am the smart guy because I’m not standing here saying the FBI blew up the people at the Boston Marathon, you fucking shitheel.”
**********
**********“We got the photos to prove it,” Bidondi insisted.
**********
**********“You got shit, you got jack shit, you got your dick in your hand,” the Boston resident replied. “You fucking asshat.”
**********
***********Watch the video. It's freaking brilliant! People are getting fed and sick of these people and their ilk.
**********
**********
**********http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/04/29/irate-boston-man-confronts-shtheel-alex-jones-reporter-over-false-flag-claim/
**********
**********
*********I hear the Israelis figure they were double agents(penetration agents??? Just parroting so don't hold me to it)gone bad.
*********I don't think there's any false flag whatsoever. They're Islamic terrorists. Pretty embarrassing they could do what they did and the declaration of martial law was total bullshit. False flag? Alex Jones is the false flag in this event and that's why I'm not a fan of his.
*********
*********
*********
********
********
********
********pleasantly surprised to see you're not buying into the 'false flag' woo.
********
*******I'm not a fan of anybody when it comes to investigative reporting. I've yet to find a news source without a bias.
*******Sucks.
*******
*******
******
******
******
******With the likes of infowars they exhibit a very obvious "confirmation bias", trying to find anything they think supports a theory which they decided on pretty much as soon as the attacks happened.
******
******Yes, I was expecting the bombers to be Islamic extremists but tried not to jump to too many conclusions. In fact, these two brothers were not quite what I was expecting. They're not Arabs, they were a permanent US resident and a citizen, and although Chechnyan rebels are Muslim (and presumably have no love of the USA) they're real beef is with Russia.
******
******
*****It's the jumping to conclusions then spreading it that I'm leery of. I think there's little doubt that the world is run by insane people for insane reasons...(where do I get that idea from?)
*****Have you seen this video.
*****This One
*****If you see what he presents then listen to what he says then he's pretty close to the attitude I have. Sure, Look at all the evidence but don't automatically jump to a conclusion or rule out anything either.
*****
*****
*****
********************
****
****a user name of AlienScientist actually wants to be considered credible? that's the kind of names a fed would use to spread disinformation
****
****
****
****so I took the time to view it...
****
****
****
****That video is inaccurate in regard to what was allegedly said on infowars - they merely speculated and others confirmed exactly what this guy said and it all was covered - every miniscule detail - its the people that took that initial speculation that spread the pic about wheres your backpack bro
****
****next - the pic he says is the 19 y/o setting the bag down - sorry but that person I the white hat is walking - mobile- and the bag - its in front of the people in front of the guy with the hat - and its stationary - so that is NOT a pic of the guy in the white hat setting the bag down - and nice how as he describes it he spends no time on the pic but immediately flashes to an emotional pic to drum up your innards
****
****
****additionally, the 19 y/o's backpack is grey, not white
****
****
****
****after that he speaks truth about the fbi staging other events which has been documented in the MSM
****
****
****the alleged device at the library was a false lead
****next - he claims this was the drill that was being mentioned by jones - again inaccurate - the drill that was mentioned by jones was the morning of the race near the finish line and people were being told to 'remain calm this is just a drill' and it was even announced on loudspeakers - multiple credible eyewitnesses are on record
****
****for the poster to claim he did his research is clearly a lie and sounds very much like what they said at the press conference - only pay attention to what we tell you to pay attention to -
****
****then he goes on about the backpack, tries to rationalize why its not the same color as the earlier pics of the 19 y/o, then he just repeats what he heard on the MSM that what we're seeing is the inside of it - hogwash - its clearly the outside of it in the pic as the pockets are right there, in tact - the portion to the right side of the backpack appears to be the still connected inside - then tries to say you can see the interior of the liner in the pic of the 19 y/o as he walks away - also hogwash - the backpack is zipped up so its impossible to see it interior of it to know what color it is/was - AND he spends A LOT of time on this which is the majority of his argument
****
****
****I'd venture to guess you've found yourself a fed flattie
****
****
****hj
***
***Did you post any of this on his site? He has a forum. Now, I'm not suggesting you do if he's a fed as you say. But I'd be interested in seeing what others have in response to what you're saying. I know one thing for sure. Nobody except who actually did this knows the truth and will never tell it. You know what I actually do? I ignore the false flag conspiracy angle and focus on the tangible evidence. Things like the roll out of the stormtroopers - the ever increasing attacks on our rights - the new focus on targeting all people who love God as fanatics - it's all spelled out in the marxist/socialist/communist agenda on how to take down a free republic by undermining it's moral sense in every thought word and deed. And let me tell you this, that don't take Hercules Poirot, Miss Marples or Lieutenenat Columbo to point out the evidence. That's where I'm at with it.
***
***
**
***********
**
**
**I have no desire to interact with that person but feel free to pass it along if you feel it should be.
**
**I listen to all the sources I can find and connect the dots based on the information provided; the information ive indicated (on this and other matters) is not based solely on infowars - actually, a great deal of it comes from RT, The Washington Post, The NY Times, The Guardian, etc etc; infowars is mostly a news aggregator......
**
**
**hj
*
*I can never get that many dots to actually connect but that's no reason not to take up the task. I'm not a fan of Alex Jones since he just doesn't exceed the requirements of objective news reporting. Doesn't mean he doesn't meet the requirement. Hell, he does better than a lot, but none the less before I'll actually do more than consider any source it has got to be willing to state the facts, not conclusions unless that source states that it is something to consider and holds it up against other considerations to judge the full weight of things since we're only judging information we ourselves can't 100% verify.
*When a consideration has been put forth and backed up with as much evidence good or bad as is at hand then later shown to be incorrect that source needs to come right out and retract it's position. Jones doesn't do that too much from what I've seen.
*Neither does anyone else. Like I said to travis, there just doesn't seem to be any totally objective news source available and it's my guess the reason why is that there's nothing available that would fit the niche. People will believe what they will believe. And the truth is not known till way after the fact. Consider the sinking of the Titanic.
*
*
******************************
jones is a human being that shoots from the hip based on his own 18 yrs of geopoliticial research - which is more than most would dare to spend on it - hes very passionate and some people cant deal with that; I personally love it - it puts the human back into whats happening around us instead of getting the news from a state sponsored robot
so you know about the Astor family? I assume so since you mention the Titanic in relation to Jones and the news
hjFollowup Messages:
- no followups have been posted yet...
Home | Web Chat | Web Boards | Discography | Library | Quiz | Art & Poetry | Links | Store
Produced by Sam Choukri
Frequently Asked Questions
Last updated on May 1, 2013